retard I'll say it right now. You'll never get a 25gb game in the next 4 years. Unless it's a compelation of two or three.
phyton what's your point. I mean, CS to me just sucks big ones. Hover around levels and shoot, no depth and dynamics.
Sony themselves won't charge you, it's not up to them since they don't make the games online infrastructure. They can say that all they want because it's good PR, and when prices do come out it won't be them giving them it'll be the games for online multiplayer.
They've said if online multiplayer games demand a price then they will get it. They can say it's free all they want but their service is still the same as free xbox live silver. And trust me you have no idea how cost...
looks cool but not worth 200 bucks, I loved Nintendo when I was a kid. Goldeneye and Mario Kart were my life as far as video games go.
Not gonna buy in this round, sorry but they should of dropped their obsession with mario and donkey kong. Instead of milking them.
I told you it's very possible to continue the franchise under a new galatic problem. This trilogy is about the arc. They have infinite possibilities.
all I have to say is that there are definately problems and obstacles with the PS3. There should be too, a different processor and the first ever in production has to have deep problems with actual yield and overheating. Not to mention they've said their ps3 case is dramatically small for all the hardware promised. They've actually changed the shape a bit by widening it I think.
That's just how I see it. The final power behind the ps3 wont' be known for months so don't ge...
dusty, sorry mate but IGN just screws their audience over.
come on chris, that's no fun...lol. We all have to attack each other's opinion or what else would I do in between work.
ohh okay...haha. My bad, i thought you were calling me box balls cause I have an xbox 360.
ummm, no. I had a PS2 and didn't like the rpg's with their magic and hack'n'slash repitition. Too much gayness for me to handle sorry. And my ps2 broke like all the other ones and I tried out an xbox. Game wise for me the xbox 1 was better, so is the xbox 360. That's just how it is for me. I've had my share of consoles.
with mine, everything's faster and better organized. I did have that one light at the end of the halo 3 trailer though. You just got unlucky.
yah I think this why I'm gonna skip on Nintendo's console again. Too many child's games, I only like Mario on 2D
assassins creed is time exclusive for ps3, so it'll eventually be on a 360. As it stands now.
The choice here is exclusive games. And if Sony and xbox swapped their prices so xbox would be 600 I'd still get a 360. Because Online and their many exclusives are just too much to ignore. I'm not loyal to the label, I have a 360 for many reasons.
And as far as I see it, all the exclusives I found out about in only the first year. Imagine what's over in later 2007. Everyone who says MGS4 can't be fully put on a 360, quit fooling yourself. This is the first year of games ...
this one game really got me excited. I think it launches on the 360 around the same time.
good job, whoever....very funny
come on, what are you gonna pick apart the obvious in a desperate attempt to discredit me. You've followed my posts for the last few times and it's getting annoying. If you have something reputable to say, your more than welcome to.
Before this article we were told that HDCP was gonna be needed in 2-3 years and have to have HDMI. Which would create problems with the 360 and 500$ ps3. Now I guess hollywood postponed this and good thing too.
this means I won't have to buy a HDMI cable for HD movies. And even sony said the HDMI difference is negligible unless your on a 40+ size screen. Even then it's a miniscule difference.
So if HDCP is in 2010 we won't have to worry about being screwed by sony's 500$ sku with no HDMI. Also means xbox 360 owners don't have to buy a HDMI in a few years. Good news for everybody.
not much new news here. The winner is still a toss up, it can sway either way.
it's simple really. The 360 still can't meet the demand from consumers. Because of that you rarely see them on shelves because every console that ships is sold. Therefore this fact means nothing because the only factor that makes this true is the lack of supply and the much higher demand.
Also to note the 360 did beat PS2's sales another month before but it doesn't matter. All this is, is a race to see who can supply the most consoles. And because PS2's are just lying arou...